WaPo Targets Vets: From Heroes To Hustlers?
In the fog of the sixth day of a government shutdown, where VA claims processing grinds on 62,000 files weekly, The Washington Post drops an “exclusive” that feels less like journalism and more like a scripted outrage machine.
Their October 6 investigation—headlined in screaming caps, “How some veterans exploit $193 billion VA program, due to lax controls”—accuses those who dodged IEDs in Fallujah of “swamping” the system with “dubious” claims for “mundane” ailments like jock itch and toenail fungus, exploiting America’s “sacred commitment” to the line-of-duty harmed.
It’s a narrative that turns heroes into hustlers, ignoring the toxic legacies of wars the Post itself has chronicled.
As a veteran rights attorney who’s helped countless disabled veterans for more than a decade—from burn pit survivors battling invisible wounds to TBI warriors lost in appeal labyrinths—I’ve seen the true scandal: Not the 0.001% of fraudsters, but a bureaucracy that too often denies the 99.9% who earned every cent.
Clickbait With a Side of Stigma
That Washington Post paywall splash?
Pure clickbait gold: A garish collage of greedy hands clawing at dollar bills beneath a waving flag, paired with a sidebar peddling $40 “unmatched political and international news” (after the first year—cancel anytime, they say).
But the real exploitation?
Hiding behind that veil to stigmatize the scarred, disabled veterans who served our country—reducing their hard-won benefits to a scam narrative for pay.
Like any system, abuses exist, and the Post rightly spotlights the worst offenders in this pro-claimant framework. But for every fraudster, there are countless instances of the system wronging veterans, delaying or denying justice for decades, even lifetimes.
The Post not only skips balanced context but risks branding millions of deserving disabled vets as hustlers in homes and workplaces—one slanted portrait equating service-scarred lives with scams.
Missing Context
The newspaper’s lede is a masterclass in selective fury: Billions for eczema (556,000 claims) and hemorrhoids (332,000) versus “far fewer” for penetrating brain injuries (10,900 eligible since 2000) or limb losses (<1,700 from Afghanistan and Iraq).
But where’s the full frame?
Those “minor” conditions often trace to burn pits—open-air infernos on bases that choked 3.5 million troops with dioxins, silica, and carcinogens.
Allergic rhinitis (680,000 claims, up 22-fold since 2006) isn’t just hay fever; when ratable, it’s a chronic sinus hell from inhaled toxins, presumptive under the PACT Act that Post reporters seemingly once championed. This condition often leads to terrible sinusitis, sleep apnea, and other problems.
Irritable bowel syndrome (up 400% since 2013)?
That’s gut-wrenching inflammation from swallowed particulates, not a spa perk, a key disability reported by those exposed to burn pit dioxins in the Middle East.
The Post mentions the PACT Act in passing, but buries how it finally validated decades of denials for these very exposures—surges they now seemingly decry as “skyrocketing” waste.
Craig Whitlock, whose Afghanistan Papers gutted Pentagon deceptions, and Lisa Rein, who exposed for-profit sharks preying on claimants, know this terrain.
They’ve amplified veteran voices, many advocates like myself have helped, such as Sgt. Maria Lopez (name changed, a composite example based on real people), an Iraq vet whose eczema from a chemical exposure makes it hard to use her hands at work. Or Lt. James Brent (name changed, a composite example based on real people), a combat veteran whose chronic IBS makes it hard to work a full-time job in a suitable occupation.
Examples involving veterans with similar disabilities to those composites listed above are everywhere.
Veterans with these disabilities aren’t “exploiters”—they’re enforcers of a promise: “Service-connected” means something during their military service caused or aggravated the condition, from long-term autoimmune disorders to black-lung mornings.
Do you think veterans with oozing eczema wounds enjoy their daily battles with sensitivity and scarring?
Would any vet with IBS’s explosive unpredictability give back that disability in a heartbeat?
No—these aren’t perks; they’re painful reminders of sacrifice, documented in medical records and vocational assessments that prove real work barriers.
Yet the Post contrasts disability data without meaningful context.
Timing Is Suspect
And why zero in on veterans now, when fraud across all federal benefits totals $236 billion yearly in improper payments?
VA’s detected scams—under $100 million, or less than 0.05% of its $193 billion budget, with just 10 prosecutions annually—dwarf in comparison to Medicare’s $20-60 billion rip-offs (3-7% fraud rate, 500+ cases yearly) or Medicaid’s $30-50 billion (5-8%, 400+ prosecutions). Even SSDI sees $1-2 billion in fraud (0.5-1%), with 200-300 busts. SNAP and unemployment? $1-10 billion each, at 1-10%.
VA’s “honor system” keeps fraud microscopic because most claims are legitimate—yet it’s the sacred cow the Post milks for headlines. In a shutdown, starving real action, this fixation smells like easy outrage: Politically untouchable cuts elsewhere, but vets?
Low-hanging fruit for bipartisan finger-wagging.
Data Skewing For Low-Information Readers
Worse, the piece dusts off a 1989 GAO study claiming 19% of claims were for “ordinary diseases” like hemorrhoids, heart disease, multiple sclerosis, Crohn’s, and uterine fibroids—alleging “no evidence” of service ties.
That’s 36 years stale.
Today’s science—fueled by PACT Act data and studies in JAMA and Environmental Health—links them to toxins: Heart disease 2x higher in Gulf War vets from oil fires; Crohn’s via microbiome chaos from deployments; uterine fibroids (63.5 cases per 10,000 servicewomen) tied to endocrine disruptors in fuels and pits. All five examples are now service-connectable, presumptive or via nexus.
Citing GAO without this evolution isn’t reporting; it’s relic-mongering to fuel shutdown-era austerity.
The Post nods to VA officials, saying “most claims are legitimate,” but tucks it after the bait-and-switch.
Their ethics demand “fairness through completeness”—so why the cartoonish illustration of cash-grabbing hands under a flag?
Or the fixation on 70 fraud prosecutions (tens of millions lost) versus Medicare’s $60 billion scam?
If the Post audited Halliburton’s Iraq billions, we’d have wall-to-wall coverage. But stigmatize vets amid delays that could cost lives? That’s not democracy dying in darkness—it’s gratitude flickering out.
The real fix isn’t slashing a $193 billion program that’s 1.4% of the wars’ $14 trillion tab.
It’s bipartisan upgrades: proper training for VA contract examiners, practical screening tests for unverifiables like migraines (1.1 million claims, up 23-fold), and full funding to clear the 635,000 backlog.
Lawmakers: Pass clean CR now, then tweak 1945 rules for 2025 realities—remote work, modern meds—without punishing presumptives.
To the Post: Retract the ridicule, or own the half-light you’re casting.
America owes its guardians gratitude, not gotchas.
There are also stories of veterans who are totally disabled and can’t work and the VA won’t fix them… and they don’t put in for 100% because they don’t want the heat from the shit heads or work for VA.
You’ll see in the comments section of the Washington Post article, people talking about “I did claims for the VA and there was fraud.” What the idiot doesn’t say is that they did tens of thousands of claims and the so called fraud wasn’t numerically significant. They also don’t highlight the disrespect and abuse they saw in VA records perpetuated by VA employees.. many of who try to rip people off all the time. So bunch of assholes just trying to sympathize with the idiots who wrote that trash piece.
Why don’t they do a story about all the deaths and the people who the VA completely and totally fucked out of healthcare and benefits? Someone needs to do an in depth study of that… publish every single horror story they can find in one repository.
How about do an article about VA spying, 4th Amendment rights violations, on veterans over bogus accusations. We see all the footage of veterans behaving badly. Where’s the footage when their bogus accusations don’t turn out to be reality? Who gets compensated for the Constitutional and civil rights violations then? Probably nobody thanks to our derelict and degenerating courts.
“Because they can work”
“Because someone ripped off benefits”
“Because of the budget”
“Because it’s not service related”
“Because it’s against the rules”
All of this bullshit by people who don’t really want the government to help out the average Joe. It’s the “terms and conditions” crowd. So tell me who makes it all some game. The game is the anti redistributionists vs the beneficiaries. There could be NO system and we’d still have these sentiments coming from these people. It’s not about the rules being broken.
Because of the substandard care at the Veterans Healthcare Administration, veterans need all the disability benefits they can get. They’re talking about “gaming the system.” The system is not good because of all the haters and people who deny care at VHA. This is why they need to move to a UBI based program after service, and an insurance program, or some kind of hybrid. Veterans don’t need to be around people who hate on things being done for other people. You got people like that everywhere, including the VA. We shouldn’t be forced to deal with such people.
The “disabled from working” part is a standard that people hold veterans that receive disability up too… but that’s their own feelings towards redistribution and their own agreement with conditions set by others. When you take out all the bullshit conditions, you’re left with people who think that helping ordinary people financially is good, and those who don’t want to see people get helped in that way. That’s why UBI would be a good thing. Then we will be able to see what those in opposition are all about. They just don’t want to see redistribution and people living an easier life as a result.
We need the names of the people who were responsible for the article. We need to pay these people a visit and have a little chat. Maybe we can find some people who have nothing to lose to go and see these people. Yeah maybe rip some hair out of someone’s head.
You got scum bags at the VA who hate veterans getting benefits too. They’re always looking to accuse veterans of bullshit and deny care. That’s why we need an insurance based program so we can get away from people like that. The VA won’t fire the mother fuckers.
This is a prologue, fed by the administration, to start denying veterans benefits to those vets who have disabilities not associated with combat, which is a horrible idea. Yeah, they found some vets pulling off some malarkey capitalizing on those cases trying to make the argument that is probably widespread, which is not when a veteran applies or benefits. He’s got to sign a form under perjury that the information she’s providing is correct. What should they do now they’ll use this example as ammunition to attack the whole system.
You noticed someone involved in the conversation with Washington Post said that their coverage was odd coming from “liberal Washington Post.” Those who wrote the piece sure weren’t left leaning. Nobody on the left would publish an article that’s anti redistribution if they were truly left leaning. In fact, the one’s who did the story make money from doing it so … that’s ultimately why they did it.. not out of some sort of political ideology. Their coverage could cause financial loss for someone else while they profit from the writing of the story. Disability fraud is rare and there’s nothing wrong with the government doing things for ordinary people bottom line.
Also,just a ‘clean’ financial assistance concept with means testing would probably help correct a lot of this. Why lie. You’re broke, life is expensive, budget permitting, m a y b e the VA can help. Maybe.
Tell ya what Washington Post, I’ll send you a 5 gallon bucket of my fraudulent IBS. Smell it, touch it and by all means enjoy the stench of fraud you pencil nosed asshats.
In other words Veterans are getting screwed as usual.
Ben Kraus, Thank you for confirming the ‘truth’.