VOC REHAB: Administrative Review vs Notice Of Disagreement vs Appeal

27

Administrative Review

Want to know how knowing the difference between Administrative Review vs a Notice of Disagreement vs an Appeal can save you six years on an appeal?

I can only assume your answer is “Yes!” if you are still reading this.

Appeals are tough when VA makes a mistake and it can be even harder finding an attorney to unravel the mistake years down the road since most attorneys are clueless about Voc Rehab benefits.

It is up to you to take control of your claim before a dimwit, nitwit VA employee torpedoes your claim. Now you are here to take action.

Some readers have been asking what I’m up to when I’m not writing. The rest of this article should give you an idea of the different battles I get into on a daily basis with VA and some of their less than honest employees.

VA NITWITS AND LIARS

Few things have become clearer to me over the past decade then the fact that many Voc Rehab employees do not know what their own laws are when deciding claims.

Many are great. Some are apathetic. And quite a few are destructive liars.

Anecdotally, one Voc Rehab counselor even tried to convince me I could not review my own file unless I submitted a request under the “American Freedom Act.”

Have you ever heard of the American Freedom Act to get your file? Me either.

Yes, she did not know the laws under which a veteran can request their file. The right answer is the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act. Those laws provide the authority for us to get our files from the government.

That counselor went on to tell me only the most severely disabled veterans could qualify for self-employment benefits because they are a last resort for vets with no other options. Her statements on self-employment were false, likely knowingly false, but she would not budge even when I explained the regulation.

Now, you may also be wondering how much the nitwit counselor I am referencing makes each year?

That Voc Rehab counselor makes $91,000 per year, and she had no clue about self-employment, appeals, administrative review requests or whether a veteran could review their file in person under 38 CFR 21.420.

She is not alone.

[kudanileads_on_click_intent optin_id=optin_1]

DOWNLOAD: Liars – Top 4 Voc Rehab Lies – Just Updated!

[/kudanileads_on_click_intent]

Veterans report to me with some frequency that their counselors have no idea what the law says. Instead, their decisions tend to fixate on how to evade paperwork vis a vis obfuscation of the rules or all out lying.

SIX-YEAR VOC REHAB CASE

I had a Voc Rehab case come up where a Vocational Rehabilitation & Employment Officer (VRE Officer) totally screwed up a veteran’s VRE claim resulting in a six-year appeal that we won at the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC).

In Voc Rehab, the VRE Officer is the boss at the Regional Office over all the Voc Rehab counselors. They manage their employees and are also responsible for conducting reviews of veteran files when the vets ask for a program change.

In the case I am referencing, the underpinning of the Secretary’s denial was exposed when I discovered the VRE Officer confused an Administrative Review request with a Notice of Disagreement for a Formal Appeal.

The veteran requested an Administrative Review in writing very clearly. The office staff acknowledged that request, but the VRE Officer got the two confused and prematurely processed the review as a Notice of Disagreement for an appeal to the Board of Veterans Appeals.

This was a big no-no, and we successfully got the claim remanded because it was an obvious due process violation.

Now, I am digging through the regulations and policies to understand what Voc Rehab believes the difference is between these kinds of review requests.

What I am about to tell you is based only on a preliminary assessment.

Normally, I wouldn’t post something like this without polishing it up a bit, but I want you all to know how to avoid a massive pitfall Voc Rehab is pushing veterans into on a regular basis across the country.

RELATED: Get Legal Help With Voc Rehab

VOC REHAB REVIEW / APPEAL MESS

Voc Rehab Denial Form Letter

I am going to start this off with a Voc Rehab form letter to give you an idea of what VA is telling veterans who are denied benefits.

Yesterday, a veteran sent me a form letter that spells out the options for a veteran after their claim for Voc Rehab benefits is denied. That form letter read:

What if you disagree with our decision?

If you disagree with our decision, either you or your accredited representative, such as a Veterans Service Organization representative, independent agent, or private attorney, can request an administrative review or file a formal appeal.  You have one year from the date of this letter to take either of these actions.

  • Request an Administrative Review

If you disagree with our decision, you can write to us and ask for an administrative review.  In your letter, please tell us the reason(s) you disagree with our decision.  Send your request to the address at the top of page one.

In an administrative review, a Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) program manager will review your records.  He/she will see if there were errors in our decision-making that would allow us to change our decision.

You cannot ask for an administrative review after we receive your appeal of our decision.

  • File a Formal Appeal

Your other option is to formally appeal our decision.  If you want to file a formal appeal, please read the detailed instructions on the enclosed VA Form 4107, Your Rights to Appeal Our Decision.

The takeaway from this form letter is that you need to provide notice to VA that you disagree in order to trigger its duty to review your claim as an Administrative Review.

There were a few other things that jumped out at me, though. What if I file a document stating I disagree with a decision and that I want to contest the decision? I make no mention of “Administrative Review.” How will Voc Rehab process this document?

It used to be that in Compensation claims, such a distinction would not matter because the substance of the letter was what mattered. That used to be the case. Compensation now requires veterans file a VA form for a Notice of Disagreement, so there is less confusion.

Veterans are not expected to have any legal sophistication, after all. Voc Rehab does not have a formal form, yet.

Nonetheless, so long as the disagreement is understandable and the desire to challenge a final decision is there, you have all the makings of a Notice of Disagreement. A Notice of Disagreement is the first stage of an appeal.

According to the M28R, all disagreements described in the above manner should start out at the Administrative Review process. Once an appeal is filed, then the review process is stopped and regular processing starts for an appeal. But a disagreement described in the above is a Notice of Disagreement that starts the appeals process.

“Wait, is that a form of circular reasoning?” you may be asking.

Yes, I wondered about this for a bit. If VA receives a document that is a Notice of Disagreement in substance, is that not an informal appeal? How can they then pull it into an Administrative Review?

Then there is the issue of the “formal appeal” option in the form letter above.

What is the story with this “formal appeal” option? Will I kill my options to have an Administrative Review if I request such a review but mid-review file for a “formal appeal”?

According to Voc Rehab M28R, once a veteran files a Notice of Disagreement, the appellate process starts and Voc Rehab is required to cease its Administrative Review.

My client’s claim got hung up for six years because a VRE Officer got confused about this nuanced issue that should be at the core of her knowledge base.

But would it surprise you to learn that an Administrative Appeal is by definition a kind of Notice of Disagreement based on a literal reading of the regulations?

Administrative Review vs Notice of Disagreement vs Appeal

What in the heck is the difference and why do I care, right?

To keep things clear:

  • An Administrative Review request is a written document that expresses disagreement with a decision and a desire to challenge that decision
  • A Notice of Disagreement is a written document that expresses disagreement with a decision and a desire to challenge that decision
  • An Appeal process is initiated when a veteran submits a Notice of Disagreement. It becomes “substantiated” or “final” after VA provides a statement of the case and after the veteran files a Form 9 to appeal the claim to the Board of Veterans Appeals

These three bulleted definitions have one thing in common. To get the ball rolling, a veteran submits a written document that expresses the veteran’s disagreement with a final VA decision and also expresses her desire to challenge that decision.

On the one hand, one document can satisfy the requirements of all of the above. On the other hand, VRE apparently treats these in a very different manner procedurally, causing a ton of confusion for veterans and its own employees.

Maybe a required form for a Notice of Disagreement would make sense here, no?

The end result is that veterans need to be very careful with what they are doing and if VRE blows it, they need to get on the horn and sort it out asap.

My take on the regulations and policy is that an Administrative Review request is a kind of Notice of Disagreement.

After all, when you strip out all VA’s Marxist language manipulations, you have a written notice that a veteran disagrees with a decision and seeks to challenge that decision.

So if these writings are all basically the same, how can one preclude another and why does it matter so much?

I have been trying to figure out how to help veterans as an attorney during the Administrative Review process. Voc Rehab asserts veterans cannot hire an attorney at that stage. They assert that representation for a fee can only start once the appeals process starts. But when is that?When does the appeals process really start? It starts with filing a document that expresses a disagreement with a final decision and a desire to challenge that decision.

When does the appeals process really start? It starts with filing a document that expresses a disagreement with a final decision and a desire to challenge that decision.

WHAT ABOUT THE FORMAL APPEAL?

Back to what I explained, a formal appeal is basically all the required documents necessary to transfer your informal appeal at the regional office to the Board after you file a Form 9.

This process starts when you file a written document that minimally qualifies as a Notice of Disagreement that could also be construed as a request for an Administrative Review.

According to 38 CFR 20.201(b), a Notice of Disagreement is a writing where the veteran disagrees with a final decision and indicates a desire to contest the decision.

The Voc Rehab M28R says an Administrative Review is likewise a writing where the veteran expresses disagreement with a final decision and a expresses desire to contest it.

An appeal is started when a veteran files a Notice of Disagreement. But I argue that it could also be filed with the exact same document as an Administrative Review. Further, that filing a subsequent Notice of Disagreement should not foreclose an Administrative Review after one has been initiated.

Consider the informal appeal and formal appeal parts of the claims like post-death comparison between Purgatory and Heaven. You do not get to Heaven until things are locked into place for your ascension.

Basically, if what Voc Rehab says is true, that filing a Notice of Disagreement cancels our your right to an Administrative Review, but all Administrative Reviews are a Notice of Disagreement, hasn’t Voc Rehab foreclosed all veterans from seeking review since all Notice of Disagreements are an informal appeal?

I do not think Voc Rehab has exactly figured out what they did with their internal policies.

This should not seem like an anomaly. After all, two weeks ago I reported that VA was wrongly stealing GI Bill benefits from veterans who previously used Voc Rehab.

RELATED: Voc Rehab Veterans Get Robbed Of GI Bill Benefits

The regulation as written did not allow deducting Voc Rehab time used from GI Bill benefits meaning VA stole millions from disabled veterans for at least one decade. VA Office of General Counsel busted the practice last December.

NOTICE OF DISAGREEMENT AND YOUR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW?

I have not figured this part out yet other than that the M28R policy manual says it truncates your due process review rights without any authority.

The relevant regulation is 38 CFR 21.59:

21.59 Review and appeal of decisions on eligibility and entitlement.

A veteran may appeal decisions of the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment staff on eligibility and entitlement to rehabilitation services to the Board of Veterans Appeals as provided in § 19.2 of Title 38, CFR. However, the veteran or an accredited representative, on his or her behalf, may request administrative review by Central Office prior to filing an appeal to BVA. A case already on appeal to BVA may not be referred to Central Office for administrative review or advisory opinion.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3107(c))

The operative words I am fixated on are “prior to filing an appeal to BVA”. What does this mean? Does this mean a veteran cannot file a Notice of Disagreement?

Since there is no formalized Notice of Disagreement, doesn’t the submission of an Administrative Review request also trigger the informal appeals process? Doesn’t the certification to the Board signify that the appeal is now “to BVA”?

When a veteran files a Notice of Disagreement form for a benefits claim within the Compensation arena, the next step is a review of the claim at the Regional Office. The veteran will also have a Decision Review Officer hearing option.

The processes and procedures are incredibly similar in function but not name, so much so that it seems Voc Rehab has created a distinction without a difference.

Well, that is not exactly accurate.

The primary difference appears to be that Voc Rehab wants to avoid dealing with attorneys in the Administrative Review process where some of its more idiotic and dimwitted counselors violate veterans’ due process right to proper retraining benefits because they are lazy, stupid or dishonest.

Another bigger problem here is that the M28R manual wrongly demands conclusion of an Administrative Review should a veteran submit an appeal in the middle of the review. As I just explained, there is a huge gray area about what exactly constitutes an appeal much less a “formal appeal” that precludes review at Voc Rehab.

For the life of me, I cannot figure out how Voc Rehab concluded it had the authority to mandate such a restrictive policy without Notice and Comment Rulemaking. This overreach has at least harmed a few veterans that I know of, and I am sure many others.

This abyss of filing a written notice that you disagree and the “formal appeal” certified to the Board is tricky business, and I hope Voc Rehab figures it out.

Thanks for reading this one — albiet a litte on the “ranty” side.

It is a work in progress, and I am hoping to get some clarity from VA on this subject very soon. And while I do that, at least you will be able to better navigate your review request.

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
namnibor
namnibor

Reading for content is usually reserved for educated and those with ability to utilize critical thinking. The VA hires through the tunnel vision of nepotism so anything beyond ‘Teletubbies’ and ‘Sesame Street’, we Veterans are at the mercy of untrained idiots that cannot even interpret their own regs and policies, let alone properly read and discern for content.

The V.A. Titanic only requires a heartbeat, at best, to be employed by their fleet of turds floating in USA. Sure, there’s some great employees, but sadly, most of the employees are there to self-serve rather than to properly assist Veterans.

vidal padilla
vidal padilla

I BEEN DENIED AN WAS AT CAMP LEJEUNE AN CONTAMINATED WATER WAS THE ISSUE AN STILL IS TO THIS DAY. ITS NOT FAIR AN I’LL KEEP FIGHTING FOR A FINAL OUTCOME TO MY CLAIM. SEMPER FI.

arnieandcaroline13
arnieandcaroline13

Vida Padilla Semper Fi right on keep fighting my belief if you did war time get Veteran Pension unless you make more money working remember don’t surrender.

Crazy elf
Crazy elf

This sounds like what has been occurring in all government and non government agencies for the past 50+ years.
(Especially, since liberal Democrat personnel have been elected or appointed to ‘positions of power’!)

Many examples are, but are not limited to just VA; ie; Laws, or regulations, that used to be on the books, were changed numerous times over these past many decades, to confuse (screw) the American public (veterans included) to such an extent, where (taxpayers) monies go somewhere else than what [it] was intended.

This has become more apparent, especially in this new technological era we now live in. It’s been said, and many will agree, the way ‘things’ can be investigated today, makes the ‘past’ seem obsolete.
In today’s society, information can be ‘instantaneously’ brought up. Laws, or rules, which are being broken can be “disagreed with” and/or “appealed” immediately. Of course, this can only be done IF the ‘person in power’ knows these rules, laws or regulations!
As I’ve stated though, IF the ‘rules, laws or regs’ have been made so confusing, then no one knows for sure how to comply!
What we’re seeing, on the other hand, is these ‘persons’ who are placed in these powerful positions, aren’t qualified to “bus tables” at a local fast food restaurant! At least that’s what they want us to believe!
In my opinion, they (these “people of power”) know exactly what their doing. Because that keeps the (taxpayers) monies where they want it to be – “in their pockets!” To be used when and where they want it to be used. Does the “Brazilian bolders and wood”, or how about the “Morris code billboard for blind vets’ ring a bell?

Seymore Klearly
Seymore Klearly

Hey Crazy Elf,

Got a question for you!

Given it costs $206,337 every hour Air Force One is in flight. Also that it takes 1 hour and 20 minutes to fly from Washington D.C. to Charlotte, North Carolina. So it is reasonable to assume that the it costed $551,000 for President Obama and Hillary Clinton to use Air Force One to fly from and return to Washington D.C for their campaign trip Charlotte, NC on July 5th of this year.

Since the Clinton campaign isn’t picking up the tab I guess us taxpayers had to pay. On next year’s taxes do we get to deduct it as donation to the Clinton Foundation?

“Looking for a Clinton payment for an Air Force One flight”, by Lori Ann LaRocco, CNBC, August 25, 2016.

“http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/25/looking-for-a-clinton-payment-for-an-air-force-one-ride.html”

namnibor
namnibor

@Seymore Klearly-

Nah, the taxpayers get TWO *treats*. The bill for Air Force One and whatever was evacuated as ‘waste’ from the plane’s bathrooms while overhead between A & B. 🙂 Wouldn’t surprise me if some of it fell on top of an unsuspecting poor, Homeless Veteran’s head, either. 🙂 (that would be called a POTUS Plop)

sher
sher

Leta not get into this den vs rep bs….when georgie bush took his 100 days of vaca, using air force one and a massive secret service detail… at his texas ranch I didn’t see anyone complaining about that…
there are good and bad players on all sides of the political isle.

Andrew
Andrew

Ben,
You hit it perfectly…it’s not just for voc rehab anymore…VA Buffalo and Albany NY use these as weapons of mass destruction, against us (the veterans) all the time…
Their end game is scorched earth in between the two cities.
I always wonder why no one has come from the OIG to Syracuse…
The lies that get told there…

Mary Rouse
Mary Rouse

Been in process for over 7 years. With buffalo currently sent copy everything to Senitor MCain . Buffalo regional doesn’t care and they do stretch the truth, like the whole VA system. They forgot to pinch 1/2 of the clip down for laperscope surgery for gallbladder. Ended up septic, fully opened up , washed out scare across whole abdomin and know have HURNIA the size of a football, they also did my right hip. Worse pain then before. Note states in a clinical situation this would be indicative of loosening the hip they put in was not to be put in people with auto immune disease. Know the tissue around the hip is neurcrotic , dead and I still have worse pain, paper work says never returned to a normal,gait. Medical diseases that, I was diagnosed with and they never told me about…..

Linda E. Smith
Linda E. Smith

Hi Andrew,
You’re 100% correct about at least one of those VARO’s.

The NOD nuances are not just for Voc Rehab.
My attorney submitted his 3 inch stack of legal argument for
a traveling law judge at one of the VARO’s you mentioned.
The law judge never saw the argument.
Why?
Well, because a rater decided my attorney’s legal argument was a NOD.
Then the rater determined the NOD was untimely filed. However, the rater
was nice enough to make a new claim for an increased rating & TDIU which
were both denied. My claims recently went back to BVA due process be damned.

*I signed up for Voc Rehab for their expertise in determining what can be
done to make me employable. Thanks to Mr. Krause for separating the fine line
between an administrative review and a NOD.

Papa Reed
Papa Reed

I am so sorry to hear of your troubles and those of others here and in person.

Even if all that is desired is improvement in life enjoyment it is a morale imperative to grant it.

Voc. Rehab. if applied soon enough actually makes money for the Government {cost vs higher income tax receipts}even if only done for the original goal of training for a specific vocational objective grant it.

The generation of VA employees who started right after World War II and were collectively know in the VA as “The class of 45” had a motto : Allow if you can, deny only if you must, but whatever you do, don’t let a case gather dust.

The Class of 45 no longer are employed by the VA and regrettably their spirit has been killed.

Much to the loss for so many of us whose needs are not being met.

Seymore Klearly
Seymore Klearly

A FOIA request release of the Dallas shooters Veterans Administrations medical records to the Dallas Morning News shows that the Shooter Micah Johnson had sought treatment from the VA for Insomnia, Paranoia and Panic Attacks.

He said he was angry all the time. “I feel stress, anger, road rage, my hearth feels like someone is pinching it”.

Although the was medical records state he was taking anti-anxiety and anti-depression medicines one entry in his medical records claims he was not prescribed anti-psychotic drugs.

“Dallas shooter showed signs of PTSD when he returned from Afghanistan, VA records show”, by Kevin Krause and Sue Ambrose, The Dallas Morning News, August 24, 2016.

“http://www.dallasnews.com/news/local-news/20160824-dallas-shooter-showed-signs-of-ptsd-when-he-returned-from-afghanistan-va-records-show.ece”

Don Avant
Don Avant

So…How does one become a Voc Rehab Counselor…Sounds like they need a few good men…Could one use Voc Rehab bennies for the training, kinda like you used Voc Rehab to become a lawyer? Just a thought…

Reuben Castro Acosta
Reuben Castro Acosta

pendejo us tax payers @ vets shut va under rico federal rico racket ASAP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

redturtle984
redturtle984

This points to the systemic problem with VA – since they play by different rules, unless a person is born into a VA family there is no possible way anyone can begin to understand the nuance of such an enormous and titanic effort of mankind that has built the symphony of regulations, rules, decisions, mandates, executive orders, administrative directives, standing orders, union regulations, Court orders, US Code of federal regulations, and the sign in the potty that demands they wash their hands. Its just too much for a hungry hippo to grasp when they have a HoHo between their mandibles.

I have known many foreigners that never played baseball or watched it. I took a few to a local game. I tried my best to explain the game, and all went well until a foul ball got hit. Try explaining that. Then a foul ball got hit and was caught. Try to to explain why the guy was “out”, but another runner got to “steal” a base by “sliding in”.

After that, go get a beer and get drunk, because if you aren’t born into a baseball life, you just cannot grasp the magnitude of the nuance. Drunk is better at baseball games with foreigners. Just start shouting in german at the umpire. It helps.

My point is that to most VA people, they might as well be Germans at their first baseball game. Moreover they are being asked to umpire, announce, sell tickets, provide refreshments, and staff an information booth. The players in this analogy are the vets.

There is no,possible way the humans who are asked to grasp even a simple,game,like baseball, let alone a mamouth volumn of rules from a mamouth number of sources can pull it off. Yet, in nearly every solution I see to this catastrophy called VA, it is the idea that we need more rules. More regulation.

Question; why can SSA provide substantially the same same type of services without billboards being posted around the country informing The People that we have snakes in our midst called “public servants” disguised as Hungry, Hungry Hippos? (I am paraphrasing the billboards…)

Crazy elf
Crazy elf

Here’s how VHA in Lake Nona, Orlando, Florida treats veterans on a ROI.
On 27 May 2016 I had a “electrocardiogram” of my heart. I had to wait over 30 days to be seen. On that day, I requested, in writing, a copy of the results, plus the DVD.
Well, as days turned into weeks, then a couple months, I’d completely forgot about it.
Then lo and behold, Tuesday, Aug 23rd, I receive a letter saying – not only are they backed up on ROI’s. But they had 20 to 40 days to get that info to me.
When I called yesterday morning. I explained, in no uncertain terms, 90+ days out was unacceptable. The clerk stated he would get my request out immediately.
I asked if it’s there, why wasn’t it taken care of sooner?
That was basically our conversation.
I really don’t believe anyone at VA gives a crap about their jobs. If they did, service would be quite different.

On a side note;
I believe there could be something in that ‘test’ which the VA doesn’t want me to know, ie: an enlarged heart. Which could have been caused by Agent Orange!
Ever since (vha) medication I took, I’ve had chest pains. I’ve been on a self stress reducing type thing for many months now! Basically, I try my best never to allow shit stress me out.
I will continue to fuck VA any way I can!

js03
js03

Next trip, just request a copy of the test on CD. They gave it to me in 20 minutes. Dont ask for the results for at least a week, because that ties up the results, it makes them much more politically sensitive. After the week goes, you should get a confirmation that the results are in from your Blue Button Report. When that shows in BB, go straight to the ROI office and request the entire track on the test, the reading, and any referring documentation between the ordering physician and the cardiology spec that read the test. They will print it out on the spot, usually its less than a dozen pages in the worse scenario.

Raymond Keith Gailey M.D.
Raymond Keith Gailey M.D.

I have been told by the VA OIG that they will not get involved or investigate a claim of Voc Rehab wrong doing until the veteran has exhausted all of his appeal rights.—This is why OIG is not correcting any wrongdoing of Voc Rehab!

91Veteran
91Veteran

In my opinion the difference between an administrative review, NOD or an appeal is where that work on deciding a case is done, whether it is at the VARO or at the BVA. A decision made at the VARO level may be faster than if it goes to the BVA. A congressional inquiry to a VARO is easier than the BVA.

I say, may be faster.

My experience is only based on medical claims. I see no reason why there should be a difference between VocRehab and a medical claim.

When I filed a medical claim in late 1991, it was quickly rubber stamped denied. I knew it was rubber stamped because they had ignored the clear medical evidence of injury and surgery in my military medical records.
I was quickly told by the VA I could appeal, but was not told anything about any review or NOD. Not knowing any better, I appealed.
I got a different VSO, then submitted a better claim with additional medical issues that should have been submitted the first time if I had a better VSO. It went to the VARO and sat for months, and every time I called I was told it was pending.
After almost 2 years, I had a senator inquire, and was finally told no other issues claimed would be ruled on until the BVA ruled on my appeal. I was then told it could take up to 3 years before the BVA even looked at it. I was told if I pulled it back, I would have to start all over again at the BVA. I had no choice but to pull it back because the VA said I could not get medical care for the other claimed problems because they were not service connected. The Muskogee VARO rubber stamped my claim denied twice before it was sent to a Tiger Team in Louisville in 1996.
After testifying before Congress in 1996 or 1997, I got a call from a rating officer with that Tiger Team. She told me the papers were all out of order, and it looked like nobody had ever looked at the claim before. I told her it had been denied twice already. She said she would call soon with a decision…by the end of the week.
There was still one issue denied, but by that time, I had been told about an NOD. I filed on NOD on that issue, had a hearing before the DRO and won.
Bottom line is, the VA told a lot of vets back then about appealing without being clear on other administrative reviews or filing an NOD. I believe they did it deliberately because it made their claims backlog look better.

I believe they are doing the same thing here.

Cantigny
Cantigny

i’m glad MR @Ben wrote of this and the “Title 38 x.x.x” laws/regs. i can’t imagine how many veterans with rightful legal claims have been duped with all this VA legal exercise of mental gymnastics. today’s post should help some veterans out that file their own claims, either for VocRehab or disability.

me legal rep a year or so ago knew of the three bullet items you write about and brought to my attention reasons why he filed one over the other. i had no idea about all that and if i had still be trying to fill out such paperwork i’d be bat-shit crazier than i already i’m.

the VA and it’s legal depot in D.C. has built these type documents with obfuscated homonyms & contranyms. not unlike the current tax forms Americans try to fill out.

thankfully my current rep has a clear understanding of all that Mr @Ben wrote. most veterans like myself have had quite a few legal reps that turn us down for all kinds of reasons and often none of them returned the same reason. i wonder of the other veterans and their families that weren’t lucky to enough or crazy enough to keep pushing back on the iron door the VA has built.

glad to see the research put in here to share with veterans. i had never heard of “title 38” until fate/luck landed my browser on hadit[]com.

good work Mr @Ben

Seymore Klearly
Seymore Klearly

Hey Elf, Naminbor, all

Last Sunday 76-year-old Veteran Peter A. Kaisen shot himself outside the nursing home at Northport Veterans Affairs Medical Center on Long Island. Two people connected to the hospital stated that Mr. Kaisen was angry after he was denied care in the emergency room for issues related to his mental Health.

A hospital employee stated that Mr. Kaisen went to the ER and was denied service and that he then went to his car and shot himself. The employee also stated that “Someone dropped the ball. They should not have turned him away.”

“The Northport hospital has been under scrutiny for mismanagement since The Washington Times reported in May that it had closed all five of its operating rooms for months due to dust contamination in its decaying air ducts.”

“76-year-old veteran commits suicide in VA parking lot”, By Jessica Chasmar – The Washington Times – Thursday, August 25, 2016

“http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/25/peter-kaisen-76-year-old-veteran-commits-suicide-i/”

Seymore Klearly
Seymore Klearly

Also since the hospital has closed down all of it’s five operating rooms for several months +. Have to wonder what kind of mental midget is running their engineering department and not changing the filters, or installing new systems at the operating rooms end.

A tip to the mental midget in-charge: it really is a simple problem to solve.

“http://www.clcair.com/Portals/12/Documents/Purolator-Healthcare-Brochure.pdf”

Of course that might cut in the pay to play, by the administrator and the people farming out all the surgical work. I assume that is the research university connected to Northport and no doubt the Chief of Staff.

Jose Co
Jose Co

Sometimes, I get tired reading so many frustrations, unfair treatment, and cheating veterans. While VA employees failed to abide and follow the laws and sometimes knowingly failed to apply the laws. But what strike me most is these veterans fought courageously in time of war and some put their life in danger serving their country. Where is that courage now? Where is that “never to give up and leave your brother behind” motto? I think the best answer to that question is “Knowledge is power”. So that means equip yourself with knowledge by reading the law and regulation. It’s a lot of time “burning midnight oil” to achieve this but this is the only way to fight a winning battle against some unskilled VA employees. Finally, when you learned the law share it with your fellow veterans and encourage them to read, read, read the law. Don’t stop. Make it a hobby and it will be fun when you win the game.

redturtle984
redturtle984

I guess the vet who killed himself was finished playing the game.

Papa Reed
Papa Reed

The Notice of Disagreement {NOD} is the first step in an appeal to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals {BVA} but clearly if the communication asked for Administrative Review then turning that request into a NOD is a serious error.

Most well governed Regional Offices would get a Rating Specialist involved with the action at the very beginning of any appeal or administrative review. A Rating Specialist and not an Adjudicator should be the one so involved.

This should eliminate the type of screw up mentioned here.

An Administrative Review is when Central Office reviews to correct a “Clear and Unmistakable Error”. This is not a difference of opinion and the determination of a Clear and Unmistakable Error must be based upon the evidence of record when the decision in question was made.

The most common are those involving an error in Percentage Evaluation i.e. the veteran was awarded a 20% when discharged in 1945 and it should have been 40% and that is shown clearly by the evidence of record back in 1945.

At times it seemed that BVA and Central Office were “at war” and this could greatly help a deserving veteran in her or his benefits.

redturtle984
redturtle984

Can you name a single example of a well governed office?

Papa Reed
Papa Reed

Touche` I retired a while ago but when ever Voc. Rehab. or the OPC or even a hospital had an appeal or Admin Review Requests it was immediately referred to the Regional Office for review and assistance.

A lot was resolved or at least correctly dealt with.

wpDiscuz