MMQB: VA Official Caught Lying on Tape

Robert Petzel Caught Lying to Congress

A lot happened last week that will carry over into the weeks ahead. Most of you are likely aware that the Senate was unable to pass a veterans benefits bill, and I thought I should toss in my two cents on what happened.

Beyond this, VA seems unable to speak truthfully about anything related to deaths of veterans when VA may have contributed. Shame shame shame, but what else is new?

Hi and welcome to another edition of my Monday Morning Quarterback for Veterans. I am your host, Benjamin Krause, founder of and impassioned veterans advocate.

Today, I will talk about the following:

  • Robert Petzel caught lying to Congress
  • Senate fails veterans on funding
  • VA disability appeals skyrocket
  • Upcoming Congressional Hearings
  • POPVOX Weekly Legislative Update


Why is Robert Petzel lying?

DC Caller was quick on the scene with a report about Robert Petzel’s false statements last week during a House Committee hearing about preventable veterans’ deaths at a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facility.

Robert Petzel is the Under Secretary for VHA who got his major managerial start out of the Minneapolis VA, VISN 23. He since jumped in the ranks and has been of head of VA’s Veterans Health Administration for a few years.

Petzel is set to step down shortly due to numerous health care scandals over the past years and for his inability to ensure Congress was provided with timely oversight materials. I am sure he will go on to enjoy a hugely profitable career selling services or devices back to VA like so many other VA officials in the past.

During the recent hearing in question, Petzel was tripped up by Rep. Tim Huelskamp about numerous issues, not least of which was the death of numerous veterans out of the Atlanta VHA.

“At the Atlanta VA Medical Center the Inspector General linked three preventable patient deaths to widespread mismanagement,” Rep. Tim Huelskamp said to Dr. Robert Petzel, chief of the VA’s Veterans Health Administration.

“Well, first of all the IG did not link any deaths to the activity at Atlanta,” Petzel replied. ”There were three mental health deaths but the IG made no comment in their report about the quality of care that was delivered to them or the course of action.”

Petzel’s claim did not pass the smell test. VA’s own Inspector General determined the deaths were in fact linked to poor management.

“We substantiated that staff’s failure to ‘watch’ patients may have contributed to the subject patient’s death,” according to a related April 17, 2013 IG report titled, “Mismanagement of Inpatient Mental Health Care Atlanta VA Medical Center.”

View it for yourself. Skip ahead to minute 4 to jump right to his statements on the subject.

Senate fails to pass veterans funding

I have read both sides of this and here is what I think happened.

The bill lost mainly along party lines and failed to gain the 60 votes needed to move to the next stage: 56 to 41.

This means Democrats were unable to convince a few Republicans to cross the aisle to support it. A while ago, I predicted the bill to be dead on arrival when it surfaced that Democrats were being unrealistic with the “asks” within the bill.

Democrats decided to throw everything including the kitchen sink into the $21 billion funding bill. It was unrealistic and irresponsible at this point in light of the current political climate. My best guess is they knew Republicans would not cross over.

This afternoon, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont brought forth a carefully crafted bill to provide $21 billion in new veterans benefits over the next decade. These included medical benefits, education benefits, and job-training. It contained 26 provisions that came from the Republican members of the Veterans Affairs Committee, which Sanders chairs. It was so wide-ranging that it contained a provision that would eliminate a rule prohibiting the Veterans Administration from covering in vitro fertilization on behalf of veterans whose wounds prevent them from conceiving a child in the usual manner.”

It seems the bill failed due to an inability to prioritize needs and fund only those needs, which are vital. For example, the bill would have provided additional funding for home care needs for veterans severely wounded in combat. This makes sense. However, when you juxtapose that with in vitro fertilization language, it looks like the authors of the bill were unable to prioritize needs. This makes it a clear nonstarter.

If we cannot take care of those veterans we currently have, why would we additionally pay for those same veterans to have children? With a booming economy and tax surplus, maybe such a provision should be considered.

But, while I sympathize with those veterans, I think a more common sense approach to the bill was warranted in light of the current budgetary discussions about reducing benefits for active military personnel and veterans alike.

Meanwhile, Republicans attempted to attach things to the bill like Iran sanctions and also heeded to conversation about Benghazi. Now, this seems ill timed as well and in relative bad taste. Republicans here are basically saying, “Let’s only provide veterans benefits funding if we can create another war.” Horrible idea.

I think they should instead focus on funding the programs they are currently required to fund and stop going to war all across the world until we pay for it in real time.

All in, I do not believe either party intended for the bill to pass, otherwise they would not have acted with such childlike semantics.

If true, this means veterans are being abused by both parties. Democrats hope headlines will help them during this midterm election. Republicans hope to keep certain debates alive in their quest to take both the House and Senate.

Both parties are failing veterans and using our causes for political football, but what else is new?


Huffington Post: Senate Republicans about to screw Veterans – All for a campaign ad How They Voted Senate Republicans kill legislation expanding veterans’ benefits



VA disability appeals skyrocket

Appeals claims are now approaching three years to complete, surpassing the 900-day mark last year.

Despite goals to reduce that time span to 400 days, the agency has been unable to handle the appeals process in a responsible manner after ramming through countless initial claims. Those initial claims are reported as being decided inaccurately across the country, and no doubt exacerbate the problems veterans face on a daily basis.

As a result, the number of claims on appeals has ballooned. All in, a veteran seeking a claim who also needs to appeal a wrongful decision will need to wait what seems like a life time.

The problem here is resources. In its rush to resolve the backlog, VA allocated resources away from appeals to decide initial claims. However in the rush they failed to adjudicate those claims properly, in many instances. In what appears to be little more than a shell game, VA will now need to reallocate those same resources while veterans are forced to wait even longer.

One concern policy makers have not addressed loudly enough is how the backlog and resultant shell game impacts veterans’ access to health care benefits and rehabilitation benefits.

Certain health care benefits are only accessible if the veteran has an appropriate diagnosis first. Many times, the only way a veteran can get such a diagnosis is through a disability rating from VA’s Disability Compensation program. Likewise, a proper disability rating could mean the difference between an advanced degree and no benefits at all from VA’s Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment program.

Perhaps the backlog is nothing more than a device to decrease overall spending on veterans benefits in the long run.

Either way you skin it, veterans come up short.

Miami Herald: VA’s time to resolve disability appeals shoots up, lagging department’s goals



Upcoming Committee Hearings

I used to include a section on this and now that congressional hearings are in full swing, I thought it would help to highlight what is coming up this week.

Circle back around on the morning of the hearing to the respective committee page to view the hearings. You can also view them at:


House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

MAR 5, 2014 | 10:00AM

Joint House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees to receive the Legislative Presentation of Veterans of Foreign Wars

MAR 6, 2014 | 9:30AM

Joint House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees to receive Legislative Presentations of Multiple VSOs

Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

MAR 5, 2014 | 10:00AM

2014 Legislative Presentation of the Veterans of Foreign Wars

MAR 6, 2014 | 9:30AM

Legislative Presentations of the AMVETS, Blinded Veterans Association, Jewish War Veterans, Military Officers Association of America, Military Order of the Purple Heart, National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs, National Guard Association of the United States, The Retired Enlisted Association, Vietnam Veterans of America



POPVOX Legislative Update

I wanted to include this bit of information from our friends at POPVOX so my readers can get an idea of what else is going on in DC aside from veterans issues. POPVOX created an awesome and free software tool that allows Americans an opportunity to send a personalized message to their elected officials on any number of bills.

The advantage of using a tool like this is that lawmaker are statistically more likely to review the feedback from a verified constituent who also sends the letter than a typical petition. Here is what my friend Rachna had to say about this week:

Hi POPVOX user, 

We just learned that the House won’t be in session on Monday due to a snowstorm, but they should be back on Tuesday. Here’s the weekly update, but first a POPVOX User Tip!

“…and for other purposes.” Seen this phrase before? It occurs in the “long title” section, or summary, of a lot of bills — and many of you have asked us about it. It’s actually standard language when lawmakers are trying to keep the summary short. According to the House Legislative Counsel’s Manual on Drafting Style, “if the bill covers multiple items, ‘and other purposes’ may be used at the end of the title instead of describing each item.” (Learn more in our Washingtonian guide.)

And now, the scoop from our Hill Sources: It’s another busy week in the House, which will consider another Obamacare bill and energy deregulation legislation. In the meantime, the Senate will try to pass a bill reauthorizing childcare services for struggling families. (Link to this Update online.)

In the House: Obamacare

The House will again consider the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, this week:

  • Suspending the Individual Mandate Penalty Law Equals (SIMPLE) Fairness Act (HR 4118): This House bill, introduced on Friday, would eliminate all penalties that people face this year for failing to buy an insurance plan under the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. –

The Scoop from our Hill Sources:  Republicans say individuals should be exempt from the law just as companies have been made exempt from the law. But Democrats are expected to see the bill as another attack, and the Senate is not expected to consider it once it passes the House.

In the House: Energy Deregulation

The House will also consider five energy-related bills during the week. Each would ease rules that the GOP says inhibits the production or transport of energy resources around the country, according to our Hill Sources.

In the House: Foreign Affairs

Two foreign affairs bills are also on the House agenda:

In the House: Land Use

Finally, the House will consider three land use bills:

  • York River Wild and Scenic River Study Act (HR 2197): To designate segments of the York River and associated tributaries for study for potential inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. –
  • North Fork Watershed Protection Act (HR 2259): To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in that land from location, entry, and patent under the mining laws and disposition under the mineral and geothermal leasing laws and to preserve existing uses. –
  • Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore Conservation and Recreation Act (S 23): To designate as wilderness certain land and inland water within the Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore in the State of Michigan. –

In the Senate

In the Senate, members will spend some time approving various Executive Branch nominations. But they are also expected to try to advance:

  • Child Care and Development Block Grant Act (S 1086): This bill would reauthorize a federal program giving grants to states, which then use it to fund childcare services for low-income families. –

Last Week’s Most POPular on POPVOX.

In a bipartisan vote, the House passed the Stop Targeting of Political Beliefs by the IRS Act (HR 3865) — the top bill of the week on POPVOX. The bill would prevent the IRS from implementing new rules that define what constitutes political activities for certain organizations. See the rest of last week’s top bills(Sign up to get the Weekly Top 20 via email!)


Similar Posts


  1. Re:Veterans claims/ appeals:
    I’ve watched and weighed this conundrum now since 1989 and my first filing for benefits. One fact is amply clear. VA has a static budget adjusted for inflation. Occasionally, due to war, new VAMC/CBOC and technology are required to be up to date-hence increased spending. However, at the same time on the VBA side of the ledger, there is a different paradigm. With any protracted or extended war, there will be excessive casualties warranting high compensation yet the numbers of 0-100% ratings are flat for the last 8 years (2004-12).-i.e. the same numbers of Vets at the same amounts of percentage of compensation. Statistically speaking, this is enigma can only be explained by a cohort dying off and being replaced by like-disabled Vets.
    Imagine a bus with seating for 60 individuals. The driver is constrained to only allow 60 on at one time. In order to permit more, some must egress the vehicle. This amply explains the “backlog” inasmuch as there must be an artificial mechanism to slow down or delay the numbers for fear of depleting the funds available. Funds, as we are painfully aware, that seem to matriculate to all manner of expense such as Orlando HR conferences, performance bonuses for VISN heads where dead Vets accrue , ad nauseum.

    I have filed three times in my life. Each time the delay to resolution was longer than the prior one. Miraculously, the VA claims process in the interim has been reinvented no less the nine times specifically to resolve this perceived shortcoming. Excuses are prolific and mea culpas are always forthcoming and genuine. Much like a heroin addict, VA assures us they are almost clean and just need a little more time in rehab. Nevertheless, the delay proceeds apace. We are rapidly approaching a watershed moment when VA will be forced to acknowledge they cannot honor the 2015 125-day, 98% accuracy guarantee anymore than King Canute can command the tide to abate. When that occurs, another round of congressional investigations will ensue, VA will trot out another panoply of excuses and VSOs will testify all over about it.
    Nothing can change unless or until Congress acts. The change cannot come from within VA at 810 Vermin Ave. They, of all groups, have demonstrated they are quite content with the old boy status quo. Filner threw down the gauntlet. It is up to Miller to continue with genuine sanctions or remove the VA from the process entirely and subcontract it out to an impartial outfit like Allstate or Nationwide. They see to have no problem accomplishing the same process in less than 89 days with the remarkable 96% accuracy VA professes to possess today. One look at the 65% reversal, vacate and remand record at the CAVC dispels that myth.
    Face it. The IRS model of grant but audit is a viable concept. VA simply does not trust us to be honest and considers us malingerers seeking a handout. Until we overcome that perception, nothing will change or improve. If a Vet who committed fraud to obtain compensation knew s/he faced would face hard time at Ft. Leavenworth for the crime, the odds of that happening would be statistically insignificant. Trust is the element most lacking in this process and it seems to be unattainable. In the military, you are guilty until proven innocent. VA has simply borrowed a page from the UCMJ for their M-21 adjudications manual. 85% of VA claims are initially denied ergo 85% of Vets are cheating. Right? VA seems to think so.


  3. As regards your comments about prioritizing, in order to appease GOP, I fail to comprehend any of the items Senator Sanders listed as less than necessary, especially, the in vitro fertilization benefit. Just to remind those who may not remember Brandon Friedman’s exhaustive literary compendium of votes recorded by Senator McCain (his votes on veterans issues and vet family issues) over McCain’s 27 years in Congress, McCain voted against each and every bill brought before him. To think that this motley crew of GOP elected representatives would be easier targets to forge a bipartisan alliance for veterans than McCain has proved for decades, is nonsensical, oxymoronic, and idiotic. You need to seek a reality check before you continue to speak out in the name of veterans, Krause.

    1. Great comment Tom. I’m a realist and my opinion is based on real experience stumping on the Hill. This proposal by Democrats was a nonstarter. Yes, I know McCain does not support veterans, and I think everyone else knows that too.

    2. Especially in vitro fertilization? Esspecially? It is an elective proceedure. Or should amputees forego prostheses so another vet might get pregnant? The VA was founded to treat combat wounded vets. Those of us thereby entitled do not beliieve in expansion of services. Be responsible for yourselves, or is that too large a burden?


Comments are closed.